bottleneck
Choose style:

Author Topic: Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US  (Read 3671 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline techstrategy

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 4
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 25/07/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US
« on: March 22, 2014, 11:10:16 pm »
Successfully paired with Almond+ Beta Unit running Firmware 54. Works for on, off, and dimming no problems.

LGNilsson

  • Guest
Re: Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2014, 12:31:47 am »
Thanks, added it to the sensor page - http://www.securifi.com/sensors

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2015, 02:15:47 pm »
Confirmed I have a few of these working. I can't, however, get the rules beta to work with them. There is no option for on / off states as a trigger or action only dimming levels. Even using those, I was unable to get the them to work. Didn't play around a lot with them yet but I will play a little more and update.

LGNilsson

  • Guest
Re: Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2015, 11:07:25 pm »
It's a lot of things that isn't working properly with the automation in this firmware, expect a lot of it to be fixed in the next release

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Remotec Dimming Switch Module ZDS-100US
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2015, 09:36:31 am »
Thanks Lars! I figured as much just, throwing my two cents in. I seem to be realizing that I have been using devices that I never checked the forums to see if they were mentioned already and was playing around with this one so I figured I'd throw it out there and found this posted already. Just adding my comment  ;D.

 

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 17 queries.

bottleneck