bottleneck
Choose style:

Author Topic: IR controller for AV equipment  (Read 5238 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lonewolf

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
IR controller for AV equipment
« on: February 12, 2015, 04:30:19 am »
Is there an IR sensor that work with Almond+ and either with programmable IR (from existing remote control) or support a large database of remote controls that can be used to control home appliances like TV, Air-conditioner, etc? The sensor should work 360 degrees so you can leave it in living room and work with everything that supports IR remote control within the room.

LGNilsson

  • Guest
Re: IR controller for AV equipment
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2015, 04:39:23 am »
Sorry, split your post, as it was a new question.

The answer is yes, well, sort of - http://www.remotec.com.hk/zaspx/product_content.aspx?aboutno=36&subaboutno=30&main=f and http://www.remotec.com.hk/zaspx/product_content.aspx?aboutno=36&subaboutno=45&main=f
However, we don't support either as yet.
We'll be adding support for the ZXT-120, as it emulates a thermostat, but I'm not sure how the ZXT-300 works.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2015, 04:42:09 am by Lars »

Offline lonewolf

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: IR controller for AV equipment
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2015, 04:44:29 am »
Thanks for your quick reply.
I hope you will support such feature, and when you do please let me or us know because I will am interested to get one.

LGNilsson

  • Guest
Re: IR controller for AV equipment
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2015, 05:26:36 am »
Well, we already have samples of the ZXT-120, it technically already works to a degree, but we need to add the ability to chose between AC brands/models or the IR end.
The ZXT-300 is a lot more complex, but not impossible in the future.

 

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 18 queries.

bottleneck