bottleneck
Choose style:

Author Topic: Key fob states versus home / away  (Read 11260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Key fob states versus home / away
« on: March 12, 2015, 12:18:38 pm »
what are the differences between the key fob settings of arm / disarm / perimeter and the home / away settings?

Offline Fire69

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 344
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 03/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2015, 04:45:58 pm »
Keyfobs set the 'state' of your sensors and home/away just controls your notifications?

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2015, 04:54:29 pm »
What does changing the "state" of my sensors actually change?

Offline Fire69

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 344
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 03/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2015, 04:59:43 pm »
Hm, didn't explain it very well I guess :)

The sensors themselves don't actually change (if I understand it correctly myself ofcourse....), it's just the keyfob that changes to arm/disarmed.
This state can be used in a rule (IF keyfob armed AND motion detected THEN siren on)
The home/away settings are (for now?) just used to manage your notifications from the app I think?

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2015, 05:23:21 pm »
Ohh okay, now it makes total sense. Thanks!

LGNilsson

  • Guest
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2015, 11:14:33 pm »
Currently the key fob doesn't really do anything.
You can use it as a remote using the rules, but the idea is that the arm/disarm would be the away/home modes longer term.

Offline mparadis

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 1765
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2015, 08:36:42 pm »
Excellent that's what I was hoping for eventually.

Offline fillibar

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thanks: 4
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2015, 10:16:29 pm »
Is the keyfob controlling the home/away setting something to do with rules?
So that really ANY item could trigger you to be home or away as you desire?
While a keyfob would certainly be handy for it I can think of other ways using switches or motion detectors or combinations thereof. I think it would just be "neat" to be able to switch between home and away as a rule outcome.
Almond 3 mesh handling the home.

Offline G-Rex

  • Acorn
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 07/02/2014
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2015, 05:06:50 am »
That is what exactly we intend to do.  :)
With the new feature we can use Almond Mode as a Trigger as well as Actions for the Rules. Any device can toggle the Almond Home/Away Mode.

Offline fillibar

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thanks: 4
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: Key fob states versus home / away
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2015, 08:31:44 am »
Nice.
Combining ease of use with additional features and complexity for those that want it is difficult, but Securifi seems to be trying very hard to meet that ideal.
Almond 3 mesh handling the home.

 

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 17 queries.

bottleneck