Even without an associated schedule, a prioritized work list including both bugs and new features would sure be nice. There have been several issues I haven't brought up, because I assumed they were obvious and still being worked on, when in fact they weren't apparently even known to the devs as issues until someone else posted here. I'm actually not that concerned about exactly when something will be implemented or fixed, just that it is in the queue. And priority could just mean the order of what is being looked at, not necessarily the order of what reaches final implementation. Of course, the priority order can always change, and an issue in the list, once investigated, might not even turn out to be an actual bug..
I really enjoy the sense of community here and appreciate how everyone is patiently working together because they believe in what this product can be. I want to keep experimenting, upgrading, and testing, but without at least a dim light at the end of the tunnel, at some point I'll need to decide if I should to start looking for a different tunnel...
