Choose style:

Author Topic: Any feedback related to Android App 7.4  (Read 481 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ashok

  • Securifi Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 2495
  • Thanks: 3
  • Registered : 25/07/2014
    YearsYearsYears
Any feedback related to Android App 7.4
« on: June 12, 2017, 08:22:26 am »
Any feedback related to Android App 7.4, please post it here.

Offline Frozen

  • Chestnut
  • ***
  • Posts: 41
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 27/11/2016
    Years
Re: Any feedback related to Android App 7.4
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2017, 12:54:02 pm »
I have been messing around with the new app since it came out.

I am not too sure the thought process of the UI layout? I guess I am not really understanding the the grouping idea.  I would rather it be in some kind of folder structure, not a sliding menu. It would also be nice if we could turn this feature off or on.

The way I was sorting my devices was to put a number in front of the location so I see the devices up at the top of my list that I want to see.  Maybe I am not looking at it correctly but I think I would still prefer a folder structure.

Offline Scarlip

  • Peanut
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 03/12/2016
    Years
Re: Any feedback related to Android App 7.4
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2017, 08:47:15 am »
Anyone else find that if you need to re activate your account for any reason the system sends an email with links to places that come up with error 502 bad gateway?

Offline Scarlip

  • Peanut
  • **
  • Posts: 18
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 03/12/2016
    Years
Re: Any feedback related to Android App 7.4
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2017, 08:51:54 am »
And, while we're at it...If you try to re set your password through the app it tells you an email has been sent with a re set link but......no email ever shows up. And, if you want to share the account, an email is said to have been sent to the other person with an invitation, but, yup you guessed it....no email ever shows up.

Awesome system.

 

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 17 queries.

bottleneck