bottleneck
Choose style:

Author Topic: SensorTag support?  (Read 5317 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline luca789

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 08/09/2016
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
SensorTag support?
« on: September 08, 2016, 12:03:34 pm »
Dear Supporters,

does Almond + suppurt Texas instruments Sensortag?

Thank you very much

Luca

Offline fillibar

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thanks: 4
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: SensorTag support?
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2016, 04:32:12 pm »
I cannot imagine it has direct support, but depending on how TI did the ZigBee portion it COULD work...
Almond 3 mesh handling the home.

Offline luca789

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 2
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 08/09/2016
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: SensorTag support?
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2016, 06:30:16 am »
Thank you

Offline Zexon83

  • Chestnut
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
  • Thanks: 1
  • Registered : 13/01/2015
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: SensorTag support?
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2016, 08:02:03 pm »
@luca789 If you get one please post on the forum if it works. That is a long list of sensors for a good price. I would get a few.

Offline cthree87

  • Newbie
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Thanks: 0
  • Registered : 12/09/2016
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: SensorTag support?
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2016, 11:22:13 pm »
Sensortags are Bluetooth LE 4 not ZigBee

Offline fillibar

  • Backer
  • *
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thanks: 4
  • Registered : 02/08/2013
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: SensorTag support?
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2016, 10:39:46 am »
 I had to check TIs site originally, where it does mention ZigBee:
http://www.ti.com/ww/en/wireless_connectivity/sensortag2015/?INTC=SensorTag&HQS=sensortag
Almond 3 mesh handling the home.

 

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 16 queries.

bottleneck